For HIV/AIDS testing please click HERE for a location near you.

Newsletter
Email:
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.

Be Safe! Visit www.cdc.gov

HOME | About AIDS | Do you believe that HIV causes AIDS?

Do you believe that HIV causes AIDS?

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

There is evidence supporting the correlation between HIV and AIDS. HIV is the virus that progressively destroys CD4+ T cells, which inhibits the body's natural ability to ward off infections of many different types. Many medications that are available now slow the progression of HIV, enabling the body to continue to fight infections.

Although there may not be hard evidence that proves causation, HIV infection has been repeatedly linked to AIDS, and according to R.N., Mark Cichocki, who writes for about.com's health section (which is monitored by a panel of qualified physicians, including oncologist and medical professor at the University of Washington School of Medicine, Dr. Vijayakrishna K. Gadi, M.D., Ph.D.), "since the early 1980s, HIV and AIDS have been repeatedly linked in time, place and population group; the appearance of HIV in the blood supply has preceded or coincided with the occurrence of AIDS cases in every country and region where AIDS has been noted." (check out http://aids.about.com/cs/opposingviews/a/connection.htm for the full article).


It is important to recognize, however, that some immunosuppressed individuals (i.e., transplant patients, chemotherapy patients, etc.) may be more susceptible to AIDS-like illnesses (usually secondary infections that most healthy people need not be worried about). However, in my opinion, the data correlating HIV and AIDS is strong enough to suggest that HIV is the primary cause of AIDS.

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (28 posted):

avatar
AIDS is CHEMICAL WARFARE. RETURNING TROOPS CAME BACK FROM VIETNAM with strange illnesses. Chemicals and chemical warfare was found to be the cause. Medicine was developed in approx 1968 that worked for some nerve agents, not all. AIDS was developed as a weapon at this time - 1967 to approx 1975 that we worked on both first the cure and then the weapon of AIDS as a coverup of chemical warfare. The cure seems to work well and has been in use by Law Enforcment since 1968. Personally, I have been exposed and injected multiple times with AIDS, nearly died from the SPACE SHUTTLE CHALLENGER BLOOD EXPERIMENTS (AIDS BLOOD ON BOARD and in LAB)and was cured with oral and I.V. chelation. Not a medical doctor nor nurse by may I say the cure works, have helped others to be sucessfully treated with no traces or symptoms from INJECTIONS with AIDS TAINTED BLOOD or exposure. Living proof that the cure works. Had 50,000 units of I.V. vitamin c drip (I.V. Chelation) and biological anti biotics (posibly ampicllin) that saved my life with a few hours to live after exposure from the CHALLENGER BLOOD EXPERIMENTS. The main mission of the CHALLENGER was to find cures for diseases, may the good astronauts be remembered well. The lives of a BILLION PEOPLE are IMPORTANT as all life in important. RESEPCT TO ALL LIFE.
WILLIAM F LEGGETT DOCTORATE EMERITUS PER DOCTOR JONAS SALK with Police as witnesses.
NSA AGENT PER EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTEMENT -1984 THE FINEST POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THE WORLD.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Paul King on 14/04/2009 09:08:25
avatar
No I don't. Nothing about so called 'AIDs' makes sense when you look at it closely enough.

"Prepare to be amazed, " says George Kenny, host of Electric Politics, of his conversation with journalist Celia Farber on the topic of the AIDS debate and the big question about HIV.

Kenny writes, "When reputable - indeed, extraordinarily distinguished - scientists began to question whether HIV causes AIDS the backlash was stunning. Yet, to me, as a non-scientist, the skeptics make a lot of sense. And I question the establishment's explanation for why nobody has actually isolated an "HIV" virus. Perhaps the more radical case that HIV doesn't, in fact, exist, is right. What a thought! To get a graceful and philosophical, even poetic, look at what's going on I turned to the courageous independent journalist Celia Farber. I very much enjoyed talking with Celia and hope she'll be a return guest, perhaps on other subjects as well. Total running time one hour and 14 minutes. Click the link below to listen.

http://www.electricpolitics.com/media/mp3/EP2008.10.17.mp3
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
2
Karri Stokely on 14/04/2009 12:42:08
avatar
Personally, I can't believe that AIDS orthodoxy admitted the fact in the second paragraph, first sentence!

www.myspace.com/rethinkaids
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
John Bleau on 14/04/2009 12:56:35
avatar
No I don't. HIV itself is never directly tested for - the tests are for antibodies. The antibodies have never been definitively linked to HIV and have never been proven to be specific to HIV, which itself has never been truly isolated as a contiguous entity. But the CDC definition of AIDS requires a positive HIV test and a CD4 cell count under 200. So of course a positive test result will "correlate" with AIDS - it's defined that way.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Oigen on 14/04/2009 15:48:47
avatar
Most emphatically no. AIDS has always existed and can be caused by just about any medical affliction known to man but the phantom HIV which, along with Popovik (a.k.a. Igor), was concocted out of a foaming test tube by that fraudster Bobble Head Gallo (a.k.a. FrankenGallo).... See....http://tinyurl.com/cbensd....
What is called HIV is more likely just scrap protein, a marker of some affliction due to the normal machinations of one's immune system fighting real diseases of which many have known remedies.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Dan on 14/04/2009 16:48:50
avatar
This line in the article says everything we need to know.

"Although there may not be hard evidence that proves causation..."
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
T.rex on 14/04/2009 17:26:48
avatar
i have no problem believing a virus (or a number of virus's) are passed along, though i've seen no data to convince me that a virus is responsible for aids deaths. it could very well just be along for the ride. in fact, the most relevant piece of data "how exactly hiv kills t-cells" still baffles doctors, even though their entire theory is based on this notion.

it can not be underestimated, the power of suggestion. a doctor verbally convincing someone they are dying... then that person will in fact start dying. DYING! And then, if they stop believing it, they are restored to health.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
whereistheproof on 14/04/2009 20:43:07
avatar
I live with this so called HI virus for more 22 years. I cycle to work every day. I eat and drink what I like. I work hard. I am living proof that HIV does not cause AIDS. And I am fighting the AIDS orthodoxy every step of the way. We are singled out, tested by tests that are not specific, for a virus that has not been isolated. We are discriminated against. Some of us are locked up. Parents lose their children if they do not comply with ARV treatment. We are cash cows to the HIV/AIDS pharma industry. But the truth will prevail. HIV does not cause AIDS. Ignorance, war, poverty, greed and corruption does.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
obmode on 14/04/2009 22:06:15
avatar
I tested hiv positive in 1993 and took hiv drugs on and off for a total of 11 years until 2 years ago when I got high speed internet and found information I had not seen before. I will never take hiv drugs again knowing what I now know, but it was not easy to get to that point. It has been very, very painful to realize what is ture science and what is propaganda designed to sexually terrorize people. I have compiled all the best video information currently available about hiv and AIDS at a channel I created, please visit www.youtube.com/hivquestions (and healing alternatives)
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
obmode on 14/04/2009 22:15:53
avatar
link thru to 'hivquestions' (and healing alternatives) by clicking on obmode for this post - the previous web url was redundant with http:// - and look for the link to observationmode in the friends section of that channel next to madonna and celine dion and annie lennox.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
shaq on 15/04/2009 00:17:21
avatar
you the funniest thing about medical orthodox is they ask you, DO YOU BELIEVE in HIV causes AIDS ? It's so funny, cause if it is a proven fact, you dont ask people do you believe or not. Even worst is the inconsistency of the testing results, the surely toxicity of ARVs, and the unproven theory that HIV causes those 30 illnesses, which includes cancer. Do you know cancer is a fungus ? Now, how did the virus "turns" into fungus and causes those cancers ?

Those HIV scientists, Im sure when you're dead, God is going to JUDGE you on your briliantness. Trust me on that...
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Martin on 15/04/2009 00:42:45
avatar
The sad part about the so-called correlation between HIV and AIDS is that there is NO correlation. The correlation is between a positive antibody test (if it's even used at all) and what may or may not be AIDS. Since HIV has never been isolated from a single human being in the history of the so-called epidemic, we don't even have a valid test for HIV much less an accurate one. So what do we have? The biggest scam in medical science.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Paul King on 15/04/2009 00:45:55
avatar
Great comment Shaq. They treat 'AIDS' more like a religion than science. I once had the Chairman of an 'AIDS' society conference respond to my question regarding 'AIDS' science, "I don't want to hear the facts, I believe in 'AIDS'".

Blind faith at it's best.....?

'AIDS' is the pseudo scientific replacement for the outdated Christian concept of Hell. Now they say, "Have sex and you will get 'AIDS' (and die for your sins). Nothing changes in history except the names of the cons. Sad, very sad!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
MKATF on 15/04/2009 02:39:15
avatar
I can't believe they admitted the lack of hard evidence also. That makes their belief in it even more disturbing. You would expect maybe some dispute over the details not an admission in the lack of evidence and a willingness to carry on anyway.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
nosex on 15/04/2009 03:12:35
avatar
no coment
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1
Carter on 15/04/2009 05:13:24
avatar
Whats this! My Kool-Aide is starting to taste funny. Who wants to bet, we're going to be hearing around just around the corner, they are in desperate of several billion more to figure the ever more enigmatic mechanisms by which HIV IS responsible, but I can figure this: These guys seem to have forgotten they are accountable.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
shaq on 15/04/2009 10:19:05
avatar
sometimes we cant just be a slave to money, we just cant. Because Devil loves to bring short term pleasure, but these short term pleasure will lead to the separation of human with God and ends up in FEAR, ANGER, SELFISH, LIE, HATRED, GREED. God, on the other hand, is eternal and is complete. Everything that is natural occuring in this world, belongs to God. Everything that is created by human, INCLUDING money itself, can be used by the devil to destroy humanity. God loves us so much that He provided all the solutions to us and can be found in natural. It is up to human to apply those natural(NOT SYNTHETIC) and amen, the disease will definately be cured(slowly but surely). When something cant be cured, it proves 1 thing. It is never a problem, and in HIV/AIDS issues, why people die sometimes is because of the FEAR they love to create or instill in people. FEAR itself is enough to cause a person to let go the willingness to live. FEAR is a toxic to our body, which when internalizes fpr a period of time, will become CANCER, due to acidosis. Pharmaceutical companies need to be given some limit, else they will ruin people's lives with their effective yet misleading marketing strategy, from heart attack, cancer, depression, multiple sclerosis, hepatitis, organ failure, diabetes HIV/AIDS and other chronic illness.

STOP THE CURSE OF DEATH SENTENCE NOW. DONT BE A FRIEND TO DEVIL.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
on 15/04/2009 15:31:20
avatar
"HIV does not cause AIDS. Ignorance, war, poverty, greed and corruption does..."


If the HIV in her body had no correlation with her death from AIDS, then clearly the late CHRISTINE MAGGIORE ("spokesmodel" for the AIDS denialists) must have been an uninformed, combative, indigent, avaricious and unprincipled woman. But her deceased 3-year-old daughter, Eliza Jane Scovill? A hapless victim of those traits her mother possessed, I suppose...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Maggiore

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS_denialism
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1
Paul King on 15/04/2009 22:44:44
avatar
Eliza Jane Scovill died as a result of an adverse reaction to an antibotic NOT so called 'AIDS'. The nonsense written on Wikipedia by AIDS fanatics is a bunch of lies, distortions and smears.

It is shameful what lengths AIDS fanatics will go to to hide the truth.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
on 16/04/2009 00:06:19
avatar
So... it was only Christine who died of AIDS?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1
Paul King on 16/04/2009 00:11:20
avatar
Stop making up lies. Here is the final word on Eliza Jane: -

March 6, 2009

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Suit settled on autopsy of HIV skeptics' child

Los Angeles County has reached a $15,000 legal settlement with the husband of Christine Maggiore, the late activist who rejected medical opinions that HIV causes AIDS.

Maggiore and her husband, Robin Scovill, sued the county two years ago for allegedly violating their late 3-year-old daughter's civil rights by releasing an autopsy report that listed her cause of death as AIDS-related pneumonia. Eliza Jane Scovill had never been tested for HIV, and the couple argued that her death was not AIDS-related. They hired a private pathologist who said she had died of an allergic reaction to the antibiotic amoxicillin.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
DL on 17/04/2009 07:41:05
avatar
It seems to me there is something wrong with the AIDS hypothesis. Look at boxer Tommy Morrison. After testing positive three times over a two year period, thus ending his boxing career, he now tests consistantly NEGATIVE.

All that testing for HIV did was ruin his life for no good reason.

And Magic Johnson seems in perfect health too.

All things taken into consideration, I must say I no longer believe in AIDS.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Abby Normal on 18/04/2009 08:25:11
avatar
Yes I do. I also believe in the Tooth Fairy, Alien Abductions and Santa Claus.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Karri on 20/04/2009 16:41:43
avatar
Second paragraph, first sentence......
PRICELESS!!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Karri on 20/04/2009 16:45:21
avatar
And DL (from 4/17) you've come to the right conclusion, my friend.

www.myspace.com/rethinkaids
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
DL on 20/04/2009 22:15:53
avatar
Thanks Karri.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
A. Lohmeyer on 21/04/2009 00:46:27
avatar
I am not sure if it is real or not but it certainly was exaggerated out of all proportion.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Edward on 26/04/2009 15:11:28
avatar
The talk of correlation between "HIV" and "AIDS" is ridiculous. Of course there is a correlation -- BY DEFINITION! The truth is no one is living longer or better than those who avoided all the medical intervention. AIDS may have been an enormous blunder, but with the refusal of the orthodoxy to address the concerns brought up by those who don't agree with them, it has evolved into a criminal hoax.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Tags
No tags for this article
Rate this article
3.00